Introduction:
Between Tuesday and Thursday, 12-14 November 2019, the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) carried out intensive aerial strikes and artillery shelling across the Gaza Strip. This round of escalation broke out after the assassination of Bahaa Abu al-Ata, a senior commander of Saraya al-Quds, the military wing of Islamic Jihad. He was killed by an Israeli air strike targeting his home in Shujaeyah neighborhood, which also resulted in the death of his wife and wounded two of his children.[1] In retaliation, Saraya al-Quds responded by firing rockets into Israel, which led to the escalation of the situation in the Gaza Strip for several days. This is the third major escalation that the Strip has witnessed this year. During the reporting period, according to PCHR’s documentation, 33 Palestinians were killed by Israeli strikes including 15 civilians, of which there were 8 children and 3 women, and 61 Palestinians were injured including 54 civilians. [2]
While most of the attacks concentrated on military targets related to Islamic Jihad, the IOF targeted also targeted civilian houses, a poultry farm, a carpentry, a commercial store, police boats and agricultural lands. According to PCHR’s documentation, 8 houses were completely destroyed and 37 others were partially damaged. Moreover, 4 commercial facilities have been also been targeted. The Palestinian Ministry of Public Works and Housing estimated the total losses of the recent escalation to amount to $3.1 million. [3]
In addition, Israel took several measures aimed at collectively punishing residents of the Gaza Strip in response to the rockets fired into its territory. On 12 November 2019, the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories announced the closure of the only two border crossings between Gaza and Israel, Beit Hanoun (Erez) crossing, in northern Gaza Strip, which is used for the movement of individuals belonging to specific Israeli defined categories, including medical patients, and Karm Abu Salem (Kerem Shalom) commercial crossing, in the southern Gaza Strip.[4] The Coordinator also announced the reduction of the permissible fishing zone to 6 nautical miles until further notice.
This round of escalation is considered to be the third major escalation to have occurred this year. The last round of escalation took place between 03-06 May 2019, during which thirteen Palestinian civilians were killed as a result of Israel strikes including three women and a child.[5] The first round took place between 25-26 March 2019, in which two Palestinians civilians were wounded as a result of Israeli air strikes.[6] In both escalations, IOF continued to use its policy of targeting residential buildings and residential buildings as well as civilian houses in violation of international humanitarian law.
Israeli Attacks on Civilians and Civilian Objects:
This report focuses on IOF’s targeting of civilians as well as civilian buildings and objects across the Gaza Strip between 12 November- 14 November 2019. The information provided in this report is based on investigations and field visits conducted by PCHR team.
Gaza City:
Middle Area:
Khan Younis:
Rafah:
Legal Analysis:
Al-Sawaraka Family
Israel’s attacks on civilians and civilian objects during the reporting period is another evidence and continuation of Israel’s complete disregard for the principles of international humanitarian law more specifically the principle of distinction. The principle of distinction entails a duty to prevent erroneous targeting, and in any event to minimize the infliction of incidental death, injury and destruction in respect of persons and objects protected against direct attacks. [8]
The targeting of al-Sawaraka family, which led to the killing of 8 civilians, including 5 children, was based on outdated intelligence which classified the building as an “infrastructure target”, meaning that it was of interest a site, although not because of an individual linked to it. [9] The targeted site was a complex of shacks, a target that even if used by the Islamic Jihad, it would not have much significance or harm its capabilities. In this case, the IOF, the attacking party, must have taken all feasible precautions prior to the attack in case civilians were present in order to avoid as much incidental harm to civilians as possible. Feasible precautions are defined as “those precautions which are practicable or practically possible taking into account all circumstances ruling at the time, including humanitarian and military considerations.”[10] Among the factors to be taken into account are the available intelligence and urgency of military action.[11] As the information that the IOF had at the time of attack was based on outdated intelligence and the target was not of military significance, the IOF must have taken feasible precautions by giving at least an effective advance warning.
In addition, according to PCHR’s investigations, al-Sawaraka family had been living in the same place since 2005 following Israel’s disengagement from the Gaza Strip. Moreover, PCHR learned that 21 members of al-Sawarka Family were present in the building at the time of the attack. In the case IOF had conducted adequate checks before the attack, it could have found that that the building was of a civilian nature. However, Israel’s negligence to update its intelligence is an evidence of Israel’s disregard for the lives of Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip.
The case of al-Sawarka family is not the only case in which Israeli attacks resulted in the killing of civilians where no militants were present or any military activity conducted in the area. During the reporting period, three members of Ayyad Family, one of which is a child, were also killed while they were on motorcycle. In the previous escalation in May, the IOF failed on two reported incidents to give warning to residents of two civilian buildings, Building No.12 Sheikh Zayed Towers in the Northern Governorate and Zourob 2 building in Rafah, which resulted in the killing of nine civilians in total. According to Article 51(4) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, indiscriminate attacks, which include “attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated, are prohibited”. Moreover, launching indiscriminate attacks that result in death or injury to civilians may amount to a war crime in cases in which such attacks are conducted recklessly.[12]
Attacks on civilian objects
The IOF continued its policy of carrying attacks on civilian objects during this round of escalation. Unlike the previous escalation in May, in which large commercial and residential buildings were completely destroyed, the IOF concentrated its attacks on civilian houses. This report documents the direct targeting of ten civilian houses excluding the house of Bahaa Abu al-Atta. Of those, six houses were completely destroyed and four others were partially damaged after sustaining direct strikes from IOF warplanes. PCHR’s investigation found that the IOF in the majority of the incidents, with the exception of three strikes, failed to give an appropriate an appropriate warning before conducting the strikes. A party to a conflict may not damage or destroy a civilian property if the damage is excessive compared to the military advantage gained. Article 147 of the 1949 of the Fourth Geneva Convection qualifies the extensive destruction of property “not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly” as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions and may constitute a war crime under Article 8(2)(b)(2) of the Rome Statute.
Conclusion:
The attacks on the Gaza Strip during the reporting period constitute serious violations of international humanitarian law and may amount to war crimes, and therefore come under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Hence, the Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC should include the attacks which occurred during this round of escalation as well as past ones in her future investigation into the situation in Palestine, which has become of absolute necessity.
As mentioned above, the Israeli military announced the opening of an investigation into the strike that killed al-Sawrka family in Deir Balah. However, based on PCHR’s experience in dealing with Israeli investigations, it is highly unlikely that accountability will be achieved. Israel has systematically failed to conduct serious investigations into wide-spread violations that occurred in the context of three bloody and destructive offensives launched on the Gaza Strip in the last six years as well as investigations into the recent Great March of Return demonstrations. As in countless other instances, Israel has tried to justify the killing and wounding of civilians as well as the destruction of civilian objects by arguing that the attacks confirm to international humanitarian law. This underscores the urgent need for the ICC to move from its preliminary investigation into the situation in Palestine and open a formal investigation into violations, which may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, committed since 13 June 2015, the date of Palestine’s acceptance of the Jurisdiction of the ICC.[13]
—————-
[1] PCHR, “Israeli ExtraJudicial Policy Resumed: IOF Airstrike Kills Senior Leader of Islamic Jihad, and his wife, in Gaza”, 12 November 2019, available at: https://pchrgaza.org/?p=13176
[2] PCHR, “Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (07– 13 November)”, 14 November 2019, available at: https://pchrgaza.org/?p=13212
[3] Ministry of Public Works and Housing, “ Naji Sarhan: The losses of the Israeli aggression on the GazaS Strip amounted to $3.1”, 18 November 2019, available at (Arabic): http://www.mpwh.ps/article/read/508?fbclid=IwAR3Ngwz2VK_9FKOYdYZJAoT2GLNxSiuFCbyrUL6pVhDJ7WhngDFngYaHgto
[4] Haaretz, “As a Day of Violence Unfolds, Gazans and Israelis Near the Strip Gird for Escalation”, 12 November 2019, available at: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-as-a-day-of-violence-unfolds-gazans-and-israelis-near-the-strip-gird-for-escalation-1.8121429
[5] See, PCHR, “Field Report: Israel’s Attacks on Civilians and Civilian Buildings in the Gaza Strip (Reporting Period:03-06 May 2019), March 2019, available at: https://pchrgaza.org/?p=12625
[6] See, PCHR, “Weekly Report on Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (21-27 March 2019), 28 March 2019, available at: https://pchrgaza.org/?p=12214
[7] Haaretz, “Israeli Army Admits to Killing Eight Gaza Family Members: We Though the House was Empty”, 15 November 2019, available at: https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/palestinians/.premium-israeli-army-admits-strike-that-killed-palestinian-family-intended-for-empty-house-1.8129435
[8] International Committee of the Red Cross, “ Interpretive Guidance On The Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law,” May 2009, available at: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4a670dec2.pdf
[9] Haaretz, “Outdated Intelligence, Social Media Rumors: Behind Israel’s Killing of Gaza Family”, 15 November 2019, available at: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-outdated-intelligence-social-media-rumors-behind-israel-s-killing-of-gaza-family-1.8131101
[10] Article 3(4) of Additional Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended on 3 May 1996.
[11] T. Gill & D.Fleck, ‘The Handook of the International Law of Militiary Operations’ (Oxford University Press, 2015) page 321.
[12]See, e.g., International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991, Prosecutor v. Stanislav Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-T, judgment of 5 December 2003, para. 54.
439.
[13] International Criminal Court, “Palestine Declares Acceptance of ICC Jurisdiction since 14 June 2014,” 5 January 2015, available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1080